So, given a choose, which of these would you prefer, be honest and hold nothing back

Discussion in 'Bass Area; The Bottom Line' started by 70' s Tone, Sep 27, 2017.


  1. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    It can be yours...
     
  2. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    Why so?
     
  3. Floyd Eye

    Floyd Eye Member

    Messages:
    12,232
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Location:
    St. Louis, Mo.

    Why would I pick the Ric? I am a Ric guy. My main bass is a '74 FG and I always wanted checked binding, which they stopped using in either '73 or early '74.
     
  4. Jeff Scott

    Jeff Scott Member

    Messages:
    1,264
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Both of my '73 4001 basses had horseshoe pickups in them. The Mapleglo March '73 had (still does, actually) an early '60s horseshoe pickup, and the Fireglo July '73 had a RI HS PU that I installed in it (I installed the magnetic HS PU in the March '73 4001, too). :)

    :aok

    Mid to late 1973 was when the CB was phased out as a standard thing but was available on special order for many years (around 10 years) after that.
     
    Floyd Eye likes this.
  5. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    Rickenbacker needs to get off their a$$ and put the checkered binding back on their basses. ;)
     
    Floyd Eye likes this.
  6. rsm

    rsm Member

    Messages:
    14,191
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Location:
    On an island in the Atlantic Ocean
    Ric 4001 or 4003.
     
    StratoCraig likes this.
  7. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    Watch out for those 4001. The truss rods are much different than the ones in today's modern-day 4003 models.

     
  8. Jeff Scott

    Jeff Scott Member

    Messages:
    1,264
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Yes, they do not adjust/work like typical compression rods, but they are superior to them, too, when you know what you are doing.
     
    Floyd Eye likes this.
  9. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    ...which is why Ric discontinued making them. :rolleyes:
     
  10. Jeff Scott

    Jeff Scott Member

    Messages:
    1,264
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    You have done nothing but diss anything Rickenbacker related. Go away TROLL.

    Those of us in the know (to feed you some more :p) prefer the old style rods. :aok
     
  11. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    Take it easy there buckaroo. I'm not a troll. ;)
    I do, however, look at and assess things objectively, and am not like the mindless robotrons on that other web-site were all the Rickenbacker devotes conspire. o_O
    Here's a pic of my 4001 C64S in the rare Matte Black Finish, with the backwards head-stock that all Rickenbacker aficionados adore. :D
    [​IMG]
    Perhaps a company like Gibson or Fender will one day purchase Rickenbacker and correct all of their inherent design flaws that have pledged the products for so many years. :cool:
    Keep the faith buckaroo. :)
     
    noley likes this.
  12. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    1,209
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    Should have included this bass as well.
    Interesting how many times Paul played (preferred) the Hofner over the Rickenbacker.

    But then, he possessed an uncanny ear and instinct for what was best.
     
  13. StratoCraig

    StratoCraig Member

    Messages:
    3,117
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2013
    Location:
    The Fortress of Solitude
    Since the instrumental track in that video is obviously the studio recording, with the band singing live over it, Paul obviously didn't choose the Hofner for its sound in this instance. He could have used any bass on the record, though judging from the dull thump of the sound, it could be the Hofner. I'm not aware of any actual documentary evidence of which bass was used in the recording studio for that particular track.

    Paul seems to choose instruments in the studio based on the sound he wants to hear in each song (what a concept!). He is known to have used the Rickenbacker for at least one track (possibly more) on his most recent studio album, New, so it's not as if he's abandoned it. In concert he tends to favor the Hofner simply because it weighs less, as he has explained in interviews.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2017
    Jeff Scott likes this.
  14. Floyd Eye

    Floyd Eye Member

    Messages:
    12,232
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Location:
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Well I myself ( and everyone I know who knows what they are doing with a 4001) very much prefer the manual rods.

    The actual reason they were discontinued is because too many ( alleged) luthiers/techs F'ed the necks up because they didn't know what they were doing. Then subsequently blamed it on high tension rounds.


    My bass has been strung with Rotos consistently for 30+ years and my neck is dead flat and the action is unbelievable.
     
    Jeff Scott likes this.
  15. Dave M

    Dave M Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,631
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Location:
    somewhere near Seattle
    Of those listed, probably the Triple Omega or '63 Jazz. But I've never been given a choose ......
     
  16. NoiseNinja

    NoiseNinja Member

    Messages:
    387
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Location:
    Denmark
    I'd say M, even if I personally prefer short scale basses, and probably never would be able to afford an Alembic anyway.

    Looks amazing and know that the Alembic are known for outstanding craftmanship.

    Least of those basses I'd say the Rickenbacker, owned a 4003 once and although it looked amazing and sounded great I just hated to play it, as the neck was really uncomfortable for me.

    And it wasn't because I prefer short scales, that was a realization that came much later for me, at that time I played a regular 34" scale bass.
     
  17. ksandvik

    ksandvik Member

    Messages:
    6,351
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    I've owned and still own a lot of different bass guitars. But if I had a time machine I would jump back and get a MusicMan Stingray or Sterling and stick to it.
     
  18. Rod

    Rod Tone is Paramount Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    16,186
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Location:
    Land of Enchantment/Entrapment. Depending on view
    This......
     
  19. zekmoe

    zekmoe Member

    Messages:
    9,674
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Location:
    Troy NY
    Having owned a few older basses, there are few I’d covet over a new bass. If I had to choose from those, maybe the Mark King
     
  20. Dr Bonkers

    Dr Bonkers Member

    Messages:
    364
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2016
    Location:
    Paramus, NJ, USA
    L, M, or B in that order, Although L appears to be linking to the wrong bass now compared to the URL tag.
     

Share This Page