Taylor, Anderson now Babizc?

Discussion in 'Acoustic Instruments' started by Mrgearguy, Aug 2, 2006.

  1. Mrgearguy

    Mrgearguy Member

    Messages:
    437
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Location:
    LA, NYC, Nashville
    The fad of the month continues... my question is, does anybody really want these sort of things?

    [​IMG]
     
  2. dpeterson

    dpeterson Member

    Messages:
    299
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Location:
    Springboro, OH
    fugly. i'm sure it sounds original.. maybe. hard thing about building guitars and trying to be original is most people dont want original.. they want what their hero's played.

    dave
     
  3. Kappy

    Kappy Member

    Messages:
    14,044
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Location:
    West Village, NYC
    What's the purpose of the strings being spaced like that below the bridge? Is it like that for a functional reason or an aesthetic one? It almost looks like your right forearm will catch on it from time to time.
     
  4. DaveO

    DaveO Member

    Messages:
    42
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    Central, NC
    The claim is - on an acoustic you get your sound from the top vibrating but with the stings putting so much tension on the middle of the top it has to be heavily braced which reduces the tops movement. So, they fanned out the stirings to the edges and reduced the bracing on the top to produce a better sound. Does it work? I haven't tried one or even seen one. Is it reguired on an electric? Seems kind of silly on an electric, but, it is their trademark design so I guess they use it on everything.
    Dave
     
  5. Steve L

    Steve L Supporting Member

    Messages:
    400
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Location:
    North of Chicago
    I don't get your statement...are you implying that Taylor and Breedlove are "the fad of the month?" I would simply call them an alternative to the Martin/Gibson style. Lots of people like that! I played one of these new Babicz guitars a year or so ago at a store and thought it sounded great and was extremely innovative. Easy to adjust the action, etc., too. I also saw Todd Rundgren playing one live. Different is sometimes a good thing!
    I also think Taylor and Breedlove are here to stay--hardly fads!
    Check it out:
    http://www.babiczguitars.com/
     
  6. TimH

    TimH Member

    Messages:
    4,833
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Location:
    Toronto, ON, Canada
    I'd buy one of the Andersons if I could. They're great and functional if you do something like lead worship.
     
  7. Bo Faulkner

    Bo Faulkner Member

    Messages:
    3,828
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Location:
    Red Oak NC
    I think he meant the acoustic/electric design ... ie. the taylor T5 (I think that what its called ) and the Anderson ... is it the crowdster?? or the Atom??
     
  8. vampwizzard

    vampwizzard Member

    Messages:
    10
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Location:
    65 miles north of NYC
    The babizc guitars are made like.. 45 min away from my house. The idea of spreading out the strings puts the strain along a longer portion of the body. I like the way the strings feel.. they arent as tight as on some other guitars. Plays like butter.
     
  9. Ken I

    Ken I Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    8,271
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Location:
    Coastal South Carolina
    oops, now i get it!
     
  10. Slidewinder

    Slidewinder Member

    Messages:
    20
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I just picked up a Babicz dreadnought rosewood cutaway with an engelmann spruce top and the L.R Baggs imix pickup. http://www.hudsonvalleyguitars.com/shop/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=123
    It sounds fantastic, but unfortunately the clips on the site are terrible. Those are not what the guitars sound like at all.
    It's loud, big and clear. I've been playing a taylor 414ce for awhile now, which is also a great guitar but even my wife remarked that the babicz sounds bigger and warmer with better clarity.
    It has a thin neck from back to front, maybe too thin for some but it fits my hand well and I can get the action so low that you can shred on it without buzzing or high enough to play slide on in a matter of seconds with no loss of tuning or pitch.
    I haven't played the Taylor in a few days and am honestly thinking of selling it to get a babicz spider.
    Whatever the logic is behind these guitars, it's not a gimmick.
    If there's a Babicz dealer in your area I'd say try one out.
     
  11. Marccd

    Marccd Member

    Messages:
    12
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    I played the prototype and listened to an impromptu demonstration by the luthier at the after-Healdsburg party couple of shows ago. It got a lot of attention from other luthiers, especially the neck adjustment technology, but at that time in development it was not my sound.
     
  12. Pietro

    Pietro 2-Voice Guitar Junkie and All-Around Awesome Guy

    Messages:
    16,413
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Location:
    Maineville, OH
    The Anderson is AMAZING! not a fad at all, but the best plugged in acoustic guitar I've ever had. It plays and sounds amazingly. Never feeds back. Just wonderful
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page