This thread needs some seeing-eye-dogs.
He’s surely much more upset about paying orders-of-magnitude more time and money dealing with bugs than estimated, than hearing the same stuff he’s heard plenty of already. Despite my harsh take on it, I really feel bad for him.I’m sure Cliff is fuming reading through this thread. He doesn’t take any type of criticism kindly.
This assessment seems reasonable. The trickle truths were revealing in this regard. Seasoned pm’s don’t set an expectation, and only *after* failing to meet it - rinse and repeat several times more. They’ll get past this on reputation alone. Neural on the other hand doesn’t have that wiggle room, as this is the debut- pull crap like this and the pitchforks come right out.I don’t see that. I mean, the supply chain issues are beyond their control true. But as a Technology Executive for a Fortune 100 company, I can tell you that Fractal has a management problem.
The big problem I see is the performance of FX8, AX8, and FM3 teams. If Cliff is going to promote empowered, self sufficient teams then his job is to give the team the support and resources it needs to succeed. Sometimes that means intervening and even restructuring or restaffing the team if they cannot get their $hit together.
You have three attempts at building autonomous teams that have been failures. The core Axe FX products seem to have always been under Cliffs command and have done well. Everything else has fallen apart at some point. He lets the teams collapse... the hallmark of a weak manager. Failure is an important learning experience, complete collapse as we have seen and may be seeing again with Fractal is not good.
A good manager knows the difference between a team that has experienced failure and a team that is failing.
I think Cliff is a brilliant engineer who does not have the skills to manage other engineers and grow them.
This is not to knock Cliff. It is actually quite common. Brilliant engineers start a company and have no idea of how to manage it. Just look at Apple, same deal. Cliff needs to bring in someone who knows how to manage a tech company so that Cliff can do what he does best.
Then why all the issues with the FM3?the real brain is Cliff,about the AX8 there wasnt more updates because the AX8 cant handle the new amp modeling technology.
I get the "not all versions of the same physical amp sound the same" argument. Different tolerances in pots, different stock tubes, etc. but one of the big selling points of the FAS stuff is it is supposed to be super accurate to the amps modeled. FAS has had release after release and many of these releases the amps are made to sound "better" than the previous firmware. So were the original models that far off from the ones in the latest rev. and what then of those original models, are they inaccurate now?
The lesson to be learned here is don't let being a fan of a company's past blind you to the reality of the company's present.
To all of the people saying I should buy a DI interface: reamping is crucial to what I do.
To all the people saying I'm crazy for letting a piece of equipment affect my work livelihood: you just criticized every music professional in the industry.
The FM3 is not an amp,But its an amp AND an interface!
The FM3 is not an amp,
at all,
it is just a fun box pretending to sound and behave like amps,
and when it works I am sure it is fun for what it is, but will not sound or feel like the amps it emulates,
buying a reliable amp , multi fx or pedals of choice AND a separate interface will be much safer for someone stating that “ his career” is not going well due to an FM3 not working properly..(whatever that means...)
That is like saying, “it’s all good. The dog only bites occasionally”. The dog still bites and that turns some people off.If you think the Fractal forum is toxic now, you should have been there back in the early days. It’s SO much more tame and inviting now. Most of the folks, even the “it” crowd, are very helpful and kind. It’s a far more tolerant environment, especially with regard to conversations about competing products. Cliff is a good guy and has greatly calmed his online persona. He’s been very helpful, even to ME, when I’ve had questions. That’s saying something if you remember our interactions early on. I’d cut him and the company a little slack here. They’re having a rough time due to circumstances mostly beyond their control.
Doesn’t mean the FM3 isn’t a problem child.
Bingo. And even if they have the capacity, focus is key. I had a friend who made a lot of money in the mid-90's personally investing in tech startups before VC & PE money were more common. At the time, paper was still a big part of how design work was done.Steve Jobs was moved out of CEO and into a tech centric individual contributor role in the early years. Even there as an owner he wreaked havoc.
He was driven out of Apple.
Even when Steve returned and took Apple over the top, he was much more tech and vision than operations. He built a team around him to deal with what he did not do well.
Put another way, a guy who is a genius with circuits, software, and algorithms is typically not going to know much about organizational theory or operations.
That is like saying, “it’s all good. The dog only bites occasionally”. The dog still bites and that turns some people off.
Having hung out over there for a while, I can tell you they are cleaning up a lot of the posts with toxicity. They are deleting or editing posts... which I have no problem with. But if you are not there at the right moment you will miss a lot of the drama.
You have people with first hand accounts of being treated poorly recently and you have people who have seen it happen.
Add to that the “seeing eye dog” post AdminM@ felt the need to create. They know they have a problem and that post proves it. You don’t write that post if everything is peaches and cream. What is telling is that Matt not Cliff made that post. Had Cliff created a post to “call the dogs off” it would have been far more effective. But Cliff is one of the attack dogs so that is not going to happen.
Yet another example of why the “makers” should not run the company. Too emotionally invested.
A month or so ago Cliff blew me up a little on the FAS forums for using a Captor instead of a "real" reactive load box when I posted a direct Amp vs. Kemper vs. FM3 comparison. So nice of him to do, being that I just dropped $1000 on one of his products, that I waited a year to purchase, and that still isn't working correctly for some customers... I digress.
I ended up getting a Suhr RL, I have wanted one anyway or a TAE (FAS reactive load is out of stock) and ended up with the Suhr. Running the same tests the results were the same. The Kemper sounds like the Amp modeled.
I get the "not all versions of the same physical amp sound the same" argument. Different tolerances in pots, different stock tubes, etc. but one of the big selling points of the FAS stuff is it is supposed to be super accurate to the amps modeled. FAS has had release after release and many of these releases the amps are made to sound "better" than the previous firmware. So were the original models that far off from the ones in the latest rev. and what then of those original models, are they inaccurate now?
So, here I am. 3 months without any music recorded because I was repeatedly told "just a week or so. Update is gonna fix it!"
None of the updates have fixed it, and I'm still not really able to record.
Read that post and he is right, the Captor is not going to be any good for accuracy. I don't think he presented his point in any unreasonable fashion. I can tell a difference in sound between my amps direct to speakers, into the Fryette PS2 I had or the Bluetone Loadbox I own at the moment. If even these reactive units don't match the exact feel of X amp into Y speaker at Z volume then it's clear that lesser loadboxes will be even more off the mark.
I think the challenge for Fractal is the competition has closed the gap rapidly the last few years, and arrived from a downward price point. It’s an especially difficult year for small business hiccups.It should work as advertised. Period. But hinging your "business" on a single, buggy device seems more than a little short-sighted.
Fractal amp modeling is the best in class. To my ears, at least. That's the most difficult factor in the whole situation.
What’s the other stuff that the FM3 is said to be lacking at this point???
I think the challenge for Fractal is the competition has closed the gap rapidly the last couple of years, and arrived from a downward price point. It’s an especially difficult year for small business hiccups.
![]()
![]()