The "New Generation" series of Gibson Acoustics

Discussion in 'Acoustic Instruments' started by Irving Pye, Jan 25, 2019.

  1. Irving Pye

    Irving Pye Member

    Messages:
    443
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    Location:
    West Coast
    If you have seen the new "G-45", I have a question. Did Gibson take the j-15 and rename it the G-45 with a few tweeks?
     
  2. prototype

    prototype Member

    Messages:
    3,296
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Location:
    Live from nowhere
    Interesting. sure sounds like it. will have to wait and see the neck specs etc
     
  3. The Kid

    The Kid Member

    Messages:
    5,438
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    They should have just kept the J-15 as the J-15 if that's what they did. So they got rid of the 15,29, and 35 and came out with a different series? Just makes things unnecessarily confusing.
     
  4. Irving Pye

    Irving Pye Member

    Messages:
    443
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    Location:
    West Coast
    This just in...

    "The J 15 is still in the line for 2019 that has a 12 inch radiius vs 16 inch radius on the G 45 studio.

    Remember the neck on the J 15 is Maple .
    The G 45 studio will have something different( not sure what it is yet)for neck material."
     
  5. cubistguitar

    cubistguitar Member

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Location:
    Augusta GA
    Don Ruffato says they are all solid wood.


    Seems a dream deal, solid wood, made in USA.
     
  6. AustinIsPresent

    AustinIsPresent Member

    Messages:
    1,705
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    I'd say changing the wood for the back and sides is a bit more than a "tweek." I'm not sure based on the verbiage I saw on the Guitar.com article about this, but the back and sides may not be solid. The top is listed as "solid Sitka spruce" but the back and sides are just listed as "walnut back and sides." I find that if it isn't explicit that woods are solid, we're probably looking at laminate.

    All that said, I think this may be a smart move for Gibson. Martin has long offered a much wider range of options in just about every possible pricepoint. Can't afford a $700 guitar? That's ok, they have one for $550! Gibson has sort of languished here, where the best Gibson you can get for $1000 is a used one, if you're lucky. I'm in the market for a J-45 now, so if it turns out the sides are solid and these sound good, I may go for one myself!
     
  7. Frozen Rat

    Frozen Rat Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,842
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Location:
    California
    This is a smart move at $999 and $1299 (studio vs standard) as they have been missing out on sales at that price point for a very long time. Plenty of people would buy a Gibson acoustic at the right price (for them). I assume that is MAP pricing and these guitars might very well sell even slightly under that price for those that know how to dicker.

    The lack of "solid" in front of "walnut back and sides" does suggest it's a laminate too.
     
    Irving Pye likes this.
  8. cubistguitar

    cubistguitar Member

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Location:
    Augusta GA
    watch the Cosmo Music video report on the G-45 guitars

    "all solid woods" is one of the first things Don Ruffato says about the guitars, of course there are limits to the awesomeness, Richlite and satin finishes and such, but really, solid wood guitars built in Bozeman Montana
     
    AllanAnd likes this.
  9. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Member

    Messages:
    4,881
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2008
    Location:
    Exeter, England
    Probably a good idea to wait until you can play one. In my experience entry-level Gibson acoustics aren't great and there are many offshore brands that are simply far better instruments for the sort of money Gibson are asking.
     
  10. cubistguitar

    cubistguitar Member

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Location:
    Augusta GA
    I agree, wait and see is best, but of the US brands, this is a unique approach, non laminate made in USA for low $$$, no need to make opinions yet.
     
  11. plextasy

    plextasy Member

    Messages:
    833
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan
    Has anyone played one yet? I played a Songwriter and fell in love several years ago but for how seldom I play acoustic I’d jump on the G-45 if it was even close.
     
  12. OM Flyer

    OM Flyer Member

    Messages:
    4,113
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Location:
    An island of blue in a sea of red
    Not a J-15. The depth of the body is thinner and the fretboard is flatter.
     
  13. walterw

    walterw Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    35,408
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    we got one in and it sounds great, slightly reduced body depth and all.

    it's loud when you lay into it, with a bit more brightness than a typical mahogany slope-shoulder.
     
    Rod likes this.
  14. cvansickle

    cvansickle Supporting Member

    Messages:
    11,632
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA USA
    I played the G-45 Studio yesterday. The specs say the fretboard and back/sides are walnut on this model. Sounded pretty good, but the vibe was a little off. I couldn't see myself buying one.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice