This is how Cornford PTP wiring looks under the skin

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs' started by Rock Fella, May 14, 2005.

  1. Rock Fella

    Rock Fella Member

    Messages:
    2,568
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Location:
    Ards, Northern Ireland
    This is how the Hellcat looks from within
    [​IMG]

    everything bolted to the chassis and it all looks good to me , i had a look under the skin of my old DSL50 and oh dear what a mess :( , didnt know if it was an amp or a computer i was looking at:confused:

    just thought some might be interested in a look at the excellence that truly is Cornford :dude :dude :dude

    YOU ROCK CORNFORD !!!!!!

    jimmy
     
  2. riffmeister

    riffmeister Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    16,490
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Location:
    near Philly
    Nice to see that the innards match the tone! :)
     
  3. hendrix2430

    hendrix2430 Member

    Messages:
    1,229
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2003
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Hm, nice. I never thought I could get aroused by looking at cabling, pots and solder...:p
     
  4. Matt Gordon

    Matt Gordon Senior Member

    Messages:
    947
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Location:
    Georgia, USA.
    PCB based amps like the DSL's are for all intents, beyond the average users' ability to service if that ever becomes necessary IMHO, outside a simple tube replacement and bias. Anythime you have to lift something off those PCB's, things become iffy at best. Even with a huge dollar desoldering station, once you lift those pads, its all over. IMO, it is best just to replace the complete PCB. These amp makers should be able to supply replacement PCB's at reasonable costs (provided the owner has registered his/her amp with the warranty card/serial #) and thereby negating a lot of the problems with computer-based amps! :D
     
  5. Rock Fella

    Rock Fella Member

    Messages:
    2,568
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Location:
    Ards, Northern Ireland
    nice though aint it :)
     
  6. Matt Gordon

    Matt Gordon Senior Member

    Messages:
    947
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Location:
    Georgia, USA.
    Definitely a nice looking chassis. Very clean. ;)
     
  7. RichSZ

    RichSZ Member

    Messages:
    1,952
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Location:
    Right around Detroit, MI
  8. John Phillips

    John Phillips Member

    Messages:
    13,080
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Location:
    Scotland
    It does look nicely made, but why does it have to be so big? You could get that lot into about a quarter of the chassis space.

    Not trying to be negative, just puzzled...

    (Although, for me, unnecessary size is always a negative, I have to say.)
     
  9. LSchefman

    LSchefman Member

    Messages:
    13,448
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    >>Although, for me, unnecessary size is always a negative, I have to say.<<

    Oh. man, here is a great opportunity for some really lame jokes. Such as:

    "Gee, that's not what your girlfriend/wife says."

    I could think of more. But you get the idea. ;)
     
  10. doctord02

    doctord02 Member

    Messages:
    1,066
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    Looks to me that when you factor the spacing of transformers, caps and tubes on the other side of the chassis, it makes perfect sense...
     
  11. John Phillips

    John Phillips Member

    Messages:
    13,080
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Location:
    Scotland
    Only if you space them out. You could easily get everything much closer together... Mesa could fit a 100W, four-channel, tube rectified, switchable power-stage amp with Graphic EQ and reverb into that size of box ;).

    Just wondering. I wouldn't rule out that the greater spacing is intentional, and limits crosstalk between components, and so improves the tone.

    I just hate carrying around more wood and metal than I need to when it holds nothing more than empty space. I wonder if it's more of an image thing... :confused:

    I've always loved tiny, compact, powerful amps. I have no desire at all for a 'big amp' image on stage, when a small one will do the same job. Size doesn't matter, it's what you do with it that counts ;).
     
  12. big hair

    big hair Member

    Messages:
    283
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Location:
    Cheshire, UK
    Naw, little amps look odd, esp when sat ontop of 4x12s - kind of like a big person with a small head :)

    BTW - what is written on the chassis in the pic??
     
  13. Rock Fella

    Rock Fella Member

    Messages:
    2,568
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Location:
    Ards, Northern Ireland
    no offense John buddy and I really do hope you dont take any by me saying this ..............but you listen to the ,in my opinion , buzz box rectfiers compared to the stunning tone of cornford.

    ill take the cornford EVERY time over ANY mesa, ive spoken to martin kidd, dude knows his stuff and has a real pride in what cornford are about , and it shows john, it truly does. i belive that design layout to be devised to make the hellcat the best that it can be, that is what cornford has in the heart of all they make.

    if martin kidd designed it, the layout will optimise everything.

    peace to ya dude

    :dude
    jimmy
     
  14. Rock Fella

    Rock Fella Member

    Messages:
    2,568
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Location:
    Ards, Northern Ireland

    hair, i think im right in saying that THD have put the flexi into a bigger box because buyers werent so hot on a tiny box sitting on top of their 4x12 cab, i can understand that line of thinking.
     
  15. MikeyG

    MikeyG Supporting Member

    Messages:
    11,187
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2002
    Location:
    RDU Area
    I'll take any amp in the mesa line over the Cornford MK50. That amp did nada for me ... yes, I'm serious.
     
  16. tralfax19645

    tralfax19645 Member

    Messages:
    581
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Hi,
    You want small, some of the old silvertines were TOO small. they had the PT right up against the exposed preamp pots, so much hum because of the layout, they had to use a hum canceling choke in the OT to get the noise out,and darn near impossible to get replacements now.
    Rob
     
  17. Jon Silberman

    Jon Silberman 10Q Jerry & Dickey Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    36,145
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    Location:
    Northern VA
    I am going to question some of your response, Matt. No, you're absolutely right, the average amp tech is lost when it comes to working on a PCB. However, there are some who excel at it. Example: Pete Cage. That's because unlike the "old salty dog techs" we all know and love, Pete and others like him have extensive experience repairing PCBs for computers and similar equipment.

    When I brought my Reverend Hellhound to him for various mods, removing components and working on the PCB for that amp was, for Pete, child's play.

    http://www.audiocage.com/
     
  18. Rock Fella

    Rock Fella Member

    Messages:
    2,568
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Location:
    Ards, Northern Ireland
    john

    dsl100...........major pcb failure in 3 months

    dsl50.........major failure after 11 hours

    sorry mate ;)
     
  19. tele_disease

    tele_disease Member

    Messages:
    26
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Location:
    Australia
    Wiring looks good, but ...............

    If you could see the inside of one of my Matchless or Bad Cat's chassis then, we could talk.

    The wiring stuff gives me a fat, then I turn them on and the sound doubles the fat.

    Pretenders welcome, but when it comes to this, Sampson has the ground covered from a poser and aural perspective.

    :) :) :) :)

    ps, peace and love to you all, just watched the Concert For George.........AWESOME
     
  20. tele_disease

    tele_disease Member

    Messages:
    26
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Location:
    Australia
    John

    My comments were directly related to the Sampson designed amps.

    Yes there might be one or two 'related' amps that are untidy, but really, when you are faced with the build, setout and wiring quality of a real Sampson amp from the last 16 -17 years, why draw an extreme? (and admit it in your opening stament).

    Its like comparing a Marshall Valvestate with a '67 Plexi, both Marshalls right - therefore they are all PCB, transistor, cheap, particle board etc ..........untidy, inconsistent ..........................
     

Share This Page