MrBoZiffer
Senior Member
- Messages
- 456
I've got a '73 D-28. I'm more of an electric guitar player and this is currently my only acoustic. I really love it, but I know my ear is not as refined when it comes to acoustics. But, like I said, I still really enjoy the sound of it.
However, I'm interested to know why 50's and 60's Martins cost so much more than the 70's models. For instance a 50's D-28 could cost up to, or over, $10k. What's so different about these guitars than my '73 D-28? I know they were using Brazilian rosewood up until '69, but there has to be more to it than that... or maybe not, knowing how the vintage market works. :NUTS
I'm thinking it must come down to some other differences in materials, craftsmanship, and scarcity. I'm guessing the production numbers were far greater in the 70's. As far as I know Martin has always been owned and operated by Martin. But I could be wrong.
Btw, I'm not interested in buying another D-28, mine is great, I'm just curious about Martin's production history during this time period. So fill me in.
However, I'm interested to know why 50's and 60's Martins cost so much more than the 70's models. For instance a 50's D-28 could cost up to, or over, $10k. What's so different about these guitars than my '73 D-28? I know they were using Brazilian rosewood up until '69, but there has to be more to it than that... or maybe not, knowing how the vintage market works. :NUTS
I'm thinking it must come down to some other differences in materials, craftsmanship, and scarcity. I'm guessing the production numbers were far greater in the 70's. As far as I know Martin has always been owned and operated by Martin. But I could be wrong.
Btw, I'm not interested in buying another D-28, mine is great, I'm just curious about Martin's production history during this time period. So fill me in.